Skip to content

Dissecting AI Boundaries: The Platform Explores the Limits


Professor Daniel Little of the College of Michigan-Dearborn School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Thammasat School, addresses the Asian Group for Philosophy of Social Sciences 2033. School of Journalism and Mass Communication

Synthetic intelligence (AI) presents each alternatives and threats in quite a lot of areas, together with social media. Nevertheless, you must remember the fact that AI can by no means totally mirror the complexity and character of social media customers, nor can it’s self-aware. These have been a number of the key discussions on the ongoing Asian Group for Philosophy of Social Sciences (ANPOS) convention held on the Thammasat School’s Tha Prachan campus.

UNPOS Convention: A Platform for Dialogue and Analysis

The ENPOS Convention, which takes place twice a yr, serves as a platform for school college students and professionals from Philosophy and Social Sciences to come back again collectively and share their evaluation, views and opinions. Empowers taxpayers to develop their very own knowledge and understanding of the quickly altering social panorama.

Key insights from Professor Daniel Little

The principal of the convention was Professor Daniel Little of the College of Michigan-Dearborn School. His methodology for authoritarian individualism emphasizes mutual affection between society and different folks. Professor Little spoke in regards to the influence of ladies in Iran who’re protesting the obligatory carrying of the hijab. He highlighted how his work and following function a testimonial to how people can result in social change via self-expression and presentation.

In line with Professor Little, affection is just not confined to any explicit kind. Its implications fluctuate in keeping with cultural context, particular person experiences, and structural modifications inside society.

Separation of on-line profiles and self-awareness

Phanomkorn Yothasorn, director of Thammasat School’s graduate program in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, emphasised the excellence between on-line profiles and self-awareness of others on social media platforms. He stated social media platforms like Fb encourage clients to make use of their actual names and join with companions to create a extra real on-line expertise.

In line with Yothashorn, an online profile is sort of a bamboo ball with holes in it. The outer shell represents the define of the group, whereas the true human experience lies inside. Yothashorn argued that true self-awareness extends past content material shared on-line, whether or not distinctive or borrowed from others.

A number of Representations vs. True Identification

Inside the realm of social media, there could be numerous representations of an individual on-line. Nevertheless, there could be just one occasion that matches an individual’s particular experience. Yothashorn harassed the significance of specializing in the proper identification of social media clients. Folks must be judged on the idea of the frequency of their interactions and expressions, moderately than the superficial components of their on-line profiles.

Yothasorn concluded by saying that in the end, you stay the actual you whether or not you might be on-line or offline. Whereas the self could be expanded via on-line interactions, its absence doesn’t diminish one’s identification.

AI Self-Consciousness Session

Throughout the convention, the potential for AI to be sentient or self-aware was additionally explored. Yukti Mukadvijitha, one other professor at Thammasat School, talked in regards to the totally different definitions of consciousness. He acknowledged that if AI lacks self-awareness, it might act as an extension of human existence moderately than a impartial entity.

Peng Bi Qi, a doctoral candidate at Nankai School, investigates the evolution of the connection between people and AI. He emphasised that present AI methods lack necessary components that describe character, akin to subjective consciousness, self-reflection, and subjective emotions. Whereas AI know-how akin to facial recognition can establish faces and affiliate them with knowledge, it can’t seize the wealthy subjective experiences or feelings related to an individual’s face.


The Enpos convention offered a discussion board for professors and philosophers to debate the implications of synthetic intelligence and social media for private identification and social mobility. Discussions highlighted the complexity of social media potentialities and AI’s boundaries to replicating individuality. He additionally harassed the significance of true self-awareness past the confines of a web-based profile. Going ahead, the evolving relationship between people and AI will form our understanding of individuality and the bounds of AI intelligence.

Incessantly Requested Questions

Is AI able to turning into self-aware?

In response to the Unpos convention discussions, AI at the moment lacks true self-awareness. Whereas there are utterly totally different definitions of consciousness, AI is usually seen as an extension of human existence moderately than an unbiased entity. Your talent at capturing subjective experiences is uncanny.

Can AI utterly replicate the probabilities of social media?

No, AI can’t utterly replicate the complexity and individuality of social media potentialities. Discussions on the convention emphasised that social media prospects have distinctive identities and experiences that can not be replicated by AI. Social media platforms function a mode of self-expression, although don’t take over one’s complete existence.

What position does self-awareness play in a web-based profile?

Self-awareness performs an necessary position in a web-based profile as a result of it goes past the superficial components of content material creation. Convention discussions emphasised that on-line profiles shouldn’t be equated with true self-awareness. True self-awareness entails a deep understanding of oneself, whatever the content material shared on-line.

How is affection manifested in society?

In line with the perception of Professor Daniel Little, affect in society is of varied varieties and is influenced by cultural context, private experiences and structural modifications. The convention highlighted the affect of individuals in bringing about social change, akin to when ladies in Iran protested towards the obligatory carrying of the hijab.

For added knowledge, please seek the advice of the following hyperlink


To entry further info, kindly discuss with the next link