Skip to content

Epic Games urges US Supreme Court to enforce App Store ruling


Epic Video games urges Supreme Court docket to uphold tribunal ruling in opposition to Apple

Epic Video games, maker of the favored on-line sport Fortnite, has requested the US Supreme Court docket to permit the courtroom’s ruling to mitigate penalties in opposition to Apple. The choice may doubtlessly energy changes in pricing practices in Apple’s App Retailer. The San Francisco-based Ninth US Circuit Court docket of Appeals had earlier granted an injunction in opposition to Apple, giving the corporate 90 days to take the choice to the Supreme Court docket. The injunction requires Apple to permit builders to offer hyperlinks and buttons that direct consumers to totally different value choices exterior the App Retailer, bypassing Apple’s product gross sales charges. The case, which challenges Apple’s App Retailer practices, has prompted a essential consideration.

case background

In 2020, Epic Video Video games filed an antitrust lawsuit in opposition to Apple alleging unfair practices in its App Retailer. The 2021 federal election order, later upheld by the Ninth Circuit, discovered that Apple violated California’s unfair competitors regulation pointers by stopping producers from driving clients to totally different pricing methods. Nonetheless, the choice didn’t decide whether or not Apple’s pointers violated antitrust authorized pointers.

Apple’s response

In an effort to delay the implementation of the injunction because it prepares to enchantment to the Supreme Court docket, Apple argued that the method is improper in stopping Apple from implementing its pointers on all app makers within the states. Mixed, solely not with the epic. Apple has expressed concern that complying with the injunction will restrict its capacity to guard clients from fraud, scams, malware, adware, and objectionable content material.

continuously requested questions

1. What’s the goal of the injunction imposed on Apple?

The injunction requires Apple to permit builders to embed hyperlinks and buttons of their apps that direct customers to pricing choices exterior the App Retailer. It is designed to allow builders to keep away from Apple’s product gross sales charges and supply totally different pricing strategies.

2. Why did Apple determine to go to the Supreme Court docket?

Apple appealed in opposition to this resolution to the Supreme Court docket in an try and delay the implementation of the injunction. The corporate acknowledged that the testing possibility wouldn’t have prevented Apple from utilizing its pointers for all app builders within the nation, arguing that doing so would hinder its capacity to guard customers.

3. What might be the potential influence of this case on Apple’s App Retailer practices?

If the courtroom’s ruling is in the end upheld, it may require main modifications to Apple’s pricing practices within the App Retailer. Producers could have the liberty to offer totally different pricing choices to clients, doubtlessly decreasing their dependence on Apple’s product gross sales charges.


Epic Video games is searching for the US Supreme Court docket’s assist in submitting an injunction in opposition to Apple, searching for modifications to the iPhone maker’s pricing practices within the App Retailer. Apple’s enchantment to the Supreme Court docket seeks to delay the implementation of the injunction, elevating doubts about its capacity to guard customers from numerous threats. The case may have far-reaching penalties for Apple’s dealing with of in-app purchases and the App Retailer’s income mannequin, doubtlessly opening the door to extra rivals and totally different pricing methods.


To entry further data, kindly seek advice from the next link